Henderson v. Rep Tech, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Upon our review of the record, we find that the evidence adduced at trial was sufficient to establish that plaintiff was a disloyal employee (see, Feiger v Iral Jewelry, 41 NY2d 928) and that he had exploited trade secrets. Consequently, the remedies of forfeiture, a permanent injunction, and the dismissal of plaintiff’s claims were proper. We reject plaintiff’s argument that the Referee exceeded the scope of the order of reference when he determined that plaintiff must reimburse defendant employer for all salary, commissions, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Harry R. Defler Corp. v. KleemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- Harry R. Defler Corp. v. KleemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cameco, Inc. v. GedickeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Aramony v. United Way of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Luskin v. SeoaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Ulico Casualty Co. v. Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & DickerNew York Supreme Court · 2007