Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 22, 1937No. 26073PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEelton, J.

Ike Jones sued out an attachment against Hey-ward Eranklin, which was levied on a mule to which E. G-. Rhodes and W. T. Rhodes, doing business under the name and style of Augusta Mule and Cattle Yard, filed a claim based on an unrecorded retention-of-title contract dated before the issuance and levy of the attachment. There was no error in the finding of the judge of the municipal court of Augusta, to the effect that the attachment lien was superior to the unrecorded contract. Code, §§ 67-111, 67-2501; Southern Iron & Equipment Co. v. Voyles, 138 Ga. 258 (75 S. E. 248, 41 L. R. A. (N. S.)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Southern Iron & Equipment Co. v. VoylesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  2. Evans Motors of Georgia Inc. v. HearnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Jones Motor Co. v. Finch Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  4. Phillips & Crew Co. v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  5. Hosch v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Refrigeration-Appliances, Inc. v. Atlanta Provision Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  2. Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  3. Railway Express Agency v. AikenDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API