Legal Opinion

Hosch v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 12, 1923No. 14282PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

The Supreme Court in transferring this case to this coui-t held: “This is a contest on a money rule, and involves competition between a mortgage fi. fa. based on the judgment of foreclosure of an unrecorded mortgage, and an execution based upon a judgment in attachment, the attachment having been levied after commencement of the suit to foreclose the mortgage and prior to the judgment absolute rendered in that case. Under the pleadings and the evidence no facts were involved which would entitle either party to equitable relief. The remedy is purely statutory.” Hosch v. Smith, 154 Ga. 789 (115…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Southern Iron & Equipment Co. v. VoylesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  2. Cottrell & Sons v. Merchants & Mechanics BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  3. Foy v. Commissioners of Craven CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  4. Burke v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1869
  5. North v. GoebelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  2. Bank of Ringgold v. West Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  3. Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API