Burise v. City of Pontiac
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Defendant, the city of Pontiac, appeals as of right the trial court’s order denying its motion for summary disposition brought pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(7) (immunity granted by law). Because plaintiff Wilhelmena Burise 1 timely served defendant with “a notice” conforming to the requirements of MCL 691.1404(1), we affirm, although for reasons other than those relied on by the trial court. This appeal has been decided without oral argument pursuant to MCR 7.214(E).
I. BASIC FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiff brought suit for an injury allegedly caused by a defect in a roadway within the city.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Rowland v. Washtenaw County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
- Robertson v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Scarsella v. PollakMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Barrow v. City of Detroit Election CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- McLean v. City of DearbornMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Plunkett v. Department of TransportationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Miller-Davis Co. v. Ahrens Construction, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- Pontiac Police & Fire Retiree Prefunded Group Health & Insurance Trust Board of Trustees v. City of Pontiac No 2Michigan Court of Appeals · 2015
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.