Legal Opinion
Barrow v. City of Detroit Election Commission
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided June 18, 2013No. Docket No. 316695PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMurray, J.
Intervening defendants-appellants, Michael Duggan and the Michael Duggan for Mayor Committee, appeal as of right an order granting declaratory relief in regard to plaintiffs complaint for mandamus, declaring that Duggan was ineligible to be a candidate for the position of Mayor of Detroit, and directing that defendants, City of Detroit Election Commission and Detroit City Clerk Janice Winfrey, remove his name from the list of eligible names to run in the August 2013 primary election for mayor. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
This case concerns whether Michael Duggan is eligible to be placed on the…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Bullock v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Barrow v. City of Detroit Election CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Charles A. Murray Trust v. FutrellMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Trahey v. City of InksterMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
- System Soft Technologies, LLC v. Artemis Technologies, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Logan v. Manpower of Lansing, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2014
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.