Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Ponet

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 3, 1913No. Civ. No. 1269PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. Frederick W. Houser, Judge. The facts are stated1 in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover-damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by her through the falling of a passenger elevator in an apartment house. At the time of the accident plaintiff was employed in the apartment house as assistant manager and clerk, and was engaged in the performance of her duties as such when she sustained the injuries complained of. The owners of the building were joined as parties defendant, but a finding was made in their favor at the trial, and judgment was rendered against appellant Irwin, who was the lessee and in the active control and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stone v. BancroftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Smith v. SchultzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gosliner v. BrionesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. DeGraf v. Anglo California National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Weddle v. HeathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Souza v. PraticoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Barran v. AdanickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API