Legal Opinion

United States v. Gilbert

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided June 22, 1989No. 2:88-cv-00027PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CAMP, District Judge.

This action comes before the Court on plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons detailed below, plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED and defendant’s Motion is DENIED.

I. Background

In 1979, defendant Abraham Gilbert initiated an employment discrimination suit in the Northern District of Georgia against his employer, the Olympic Manufacturing Company. See Abraham Gilbert v. Olympic Manufacturing Company, Civil Action No. C79-2223A. The district court granted summary judgment for defendant Olympic Manufacturing Company…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Abraham GilbertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. GilbertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. GilbertDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API