United States v. Gilbert

SUPPLEMENTAL FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

CARNES, District Judge.

In addition to the pral findings and conclusions made by the Court at the bench trial of this case, the Court adds the following statements and makes these additional comments to clarify the potentially confusing discussion that, occurred between the Court, counsel for the Government and “stand-by counsel”1 for defendant (hereinafter “defense counsel”) after the evidence had closed.2 Stated succinctly, defense counsel argued that the Government had not proved its case because it had shown only that defendant was…