Legal Opinion
Jespersen v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided May 30, 1997No. 1-96-2349PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice South
Plaintiff, Victor R. Jespersen, doing business as Trim-Line of Chicago and Trim-Line of Chicago, Inc. (collectively Jespersen), on behalf of himself and other similarly situated distributors of Trim-Line products, filed a third amended class action complaint against defendants, the Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (3M) and Trim-Line, Inc. (Trim-Line), alleging breach of contract. 3M filed a motion to dismiss the third amended complaint pursuant to section 2 — 615 of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure (735 ILCS 5/2 — 615 (West 1994)), for failure to state a cause of .action. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Illinois Graphics Co. v. NickumIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Dayan v. McDonald's Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Saunders v. Michigan Avenue National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- Gordon v. Matthew Bender & Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
- City of El Cajon v. El Cajon Police Officers' Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Cromeens, Holloman, Sibert, Inc. v. AB VolvoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Echo, Inc. v. Whitson Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Elson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Jespersen v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Mid-West Energy Consultants, Inc. v. Covenant Home, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.