Legal Opinion

Jespersen v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1998No. 83728PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heiple

It has long been recognized that contracts of indefinite duration are generally terminable at the will of the parties.1 This case involves a twist on that general rule: where the parties specifically provide that their contract may be terminated for enumerated instances of material breach, is the contract indefinite as to duration and terminable at will, or is it terminable only for cause? The courts below held that such a contract is terminable at will. We affirm.2

This case is before the court on review from an order granting a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs complaint for failure to state…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re Chicago Flood LitigationIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Duldulao v. Saint Mary of Nazareth Hospital CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Mt. Zion State Bank & Trust v. Consolidated Communications, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Garber v. Harris Trust & Savings BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  5. Lichnovsky v. Ziebart International Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. United Airlines, Inc. v. Mesa Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  2. Mid-West Energy Consultants, Inc. v. Covenant Home, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. Automation by Design, Incorporated v. Raybestos Products Company, Raytech Corporation and Production Design Services, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  4. Kendall-Jackson Winery, Ltd. v. BransonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  5. Kendall-Jackson Winery, Ltd. v. BransonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API