Hunt v. Conrad
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant W. S. Conrad from an order of the district court for Cottonwood county, Perkins, J., presiding, denying his. motion for a set-off of the judgments considered in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtDicKinson, J.
In November, 1889, in an action in the district, court between the parties to this appeal, Conrad recovered a judgment against Hunt for $325.03, which was docketed in the office of the clerk of the court in Cottonwood county. An execution thereon *558was returned unsatisfied in August, 1890. On the 21st day of November, 1890, in an action prosecuted by said Hunt against the •defendants, Conrad, Hubachek, and Barlow, to recover for false imprisonment, a verdict was rendered in favor of Hunt, and against .all of said defendants, for the recovery of the sum of $150, and on the 5th day of February,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Comegys v. VasseSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Zabriskie v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
- People ex rel. Stanton v. Tioga C. P.New York Supreme Court · 1837
- Pulver v. . HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Lawrence v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Billingsley v. ClellandWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
- Lehmann v. FarwellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Greenleaf v. Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- Kent v. ChapelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Boogren v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.