Boogren v. St. Paul City Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Petition to the district court for Ramsey county by Joel E. Gregory, plaintiff’s attorney, for leave to continue the action for the purpose of recovering from the parties thereto his fees and disbursements, the action having been settled and dismissed without his consent. From an order, Bunn, J., discharging an order to show cause and dismissing the application, petitioner appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
This is an appeal by the attorney for the plaintiff from an order discharging an order to show cause why the attorney should not be permitted to continue the action for the purpose of determining and enforcing his alleged interest therein.
Some time prior to July, 1904, the plaintiff, Charles E. Boogren, claimed to have a cause of action against the St. Paul City Railway Company for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been occasioned by the negligence of the company. On July 15, 1904, Boogren entered into a contract with the petitioner, Joel E. Gregory, an attorney at law, by the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hunt v. ConradSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Weicher v. CargillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Anderson v. Itasca Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Hammons v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Nielsen v. City of Albert LeaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
3Cited by15 opinions
- Regie De L'Assurance Automobile Du Quebec v. JensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- National Union Fire Insurance Company v. GrimesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Davis v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Greenleaf v. Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- Desaman v. Butler Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.