Lawrence v. Martin
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the Twelfth Judicial District. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtNorton, J.
This action was brought to recover damages for a malicious prosecution. After the action was commenced, but before trial, the plaintiff assigned the cause of action to Gr. E. Parmelee. A verdict was obtained by the plaintiff, and then, before the judgment was entered, the plaintiff, as he states, with the consent of Parmelee, assigned one-half of the recovery to C. H. S. Williams. Some months afterwards, and after the judgment was entered on the verdict, the defendant paid the amount of the judgment to the Sheriff of San Francisco County in satisfaction of two executions held by him against…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Comegys v. VasseSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Kellogg v. SchuylerNew York Supreme Court · 1846
- Mallory v. Norton & ScottNew York Supreme Court · 1856
- Robinson v. WeeksNew York Supreme Court · 1851
- Hodgman v. Western Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1852
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. NakanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Woodford v. McDanielsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
- Hunt v. ConradSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Jones v. ManningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Platts v. Pac. Fed. Sav.Idaho Supreme Court · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.