Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Price v. Edmonds

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 7, 1959No. 5-1980PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. Seaborn Holt, Associate Justice.

Appellee, Edmonds, is a resident and taxpayer of the City of West Memphis, Arkansas, and pays electric and water rates to a distribution system there which the city owns and operates for distribution of electric power and water to its inhabitants. The ownership of the system is exclusive in the city by ordinance enacted in 1954. Appellants are the duly appointed and acting members of the utility commission and are charged with the operation of the electric power distribution system, the water works and sewer systems of West Memphis. It appears undisputed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Seitz v. MeriwetherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  2. Riggs v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  3. Huddleston v. CoffmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  4. City of Bentonville v. BrowneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  5. Scrivner v. Portis Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. MacKey v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  2. Marrow v. State Farm InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  3. Bryant v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Arkansas State Board of Pharmacy v. TroilettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  5. MacKey v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API