Riggs v. Hill
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtMehaeey, J.
Appellants instituted this action in the Sebastian chancery court, alleging that the appellants are the owners of the northwest one-half of lots 5 and 6, block 23, city of Fort Smith, Arkansas, and that the appellees and others are constructing a wall along the south part of the west half of appellants’ lot 5, and are encroaching upon appellants’ property on the south line six inches on the ground of said rock wall and four and a half inches near the second story elevation of said wall, 'being an encroachment on the southeast corner on the northwesterly half of lot 5. On the appellants’…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Page v. McKinleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
3Cited by17 opinions
- Wilson v. Pulaski Ass'n of Classroom TeachersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Smith v. American Trucking Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- McCuen v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Scrivner v. Portis Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
- Price v. EdmondsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.