Legal Opinion

Arkansas State Board of Pharmacy v. Troilett

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 22, 1971No. 5-5454PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lyle Brown, Justice.

The Arkansas State Board of Pharmacy, by petition in chancery, sought to enjoin the dispensing of rubber prophylactics (condoms) from vending machines located in four filling stations in Conway, operated by Anthony Troilett and his co-defendants, appellees here. The merchants defended on the ground that Act 189 of 1943, the prophylactic law, is unconstitutional. The chancellor held Act 189 constitutional but denied the injunction “because of the criminal section of the Act and further because of the difficulty in the enforcement of the injunction.” We are asked to pass on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Herman Wilson Lumber Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  2. Price v. EdmondsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  3. Arkansas State Board of Architects v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. East Poinsett County School District No. 14 v. MasseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. American Investors Life Insurance v. TCB Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Bryant v. PicadoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Bryant v. PicadoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API