Legal Opinion

Government Employees Insurance Company v. Poole

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 5, 2018No. Appellate Case 2017-001540; Opinion 27821PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JUSTICE HEARN :

*285 **3 We accepted a certified question from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, asking whether South Carolina law requires that punitive damages be apportioned pro rata between those sustained for bodily injury and property damage, respectively, under an automobile insurance policy. We answer the question, "No."

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Jack Poole and his wife, Jennifer, were riding in a vehicle owned by Doris Knight, Jennifer's mother, when a drunk driver crossed the center line and struck them. The Pooles were both seriously injured in the collision;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Sloan v. HardeeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. HamiltonDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1971
  5. O'NEILL v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. USAA Casualty Insurance Company v. RaffertyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API