Government Employees Insurance Company v. Poole
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JUSTICE HEARN :
*285 **3 We accepted a certified question from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, asking whether South Carolina law requires that punitive damages be apportioned pro rata between those sustained for bodily injury and property damage, respectively, under an automobile insurance policy. We answer the question, "No."
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Jack Poole and his wife, Jennifer, were riding in a vehicle owned by Doris Knight, Jennifer's mother, when a drunk driver crossed the center line and struck them. The Pooles were both seriously injured in the collision;…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Sloan v. HardeeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. HamiltonDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1971
- O'NEILL v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
3Cited by1 opinion
- USAA Casualty Insurance Company v. RaffertyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021