Legal Opinion
Sloan v. Hardee
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided January 8, 2007No. 26242PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Justice WALLER:
We accepted this matter in our original jurisdiction to address whether Respondents, Commissioners for the South Carolina Department of Transportation (DOT), were appointed in violation of S.C.Code Ann. § 57-l-330(A)(2006).
FACTS
Hardee, Harrell and Truluck are DOT Commissioners. Hardee was appointed to a four-year term, to be served from February 18, 1998 to February 15, 2002. In June 2001, his legislative delegation re-elected him to serve a second term, from February 2002 until August 2002. Thereafter, in May 2002, his legislative delegation re-elected him to serve as DOT…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hodges v. RaineySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Kiriakides v. United Artists Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Baird v. Charleston CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- State v. BlackmonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Bryant v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- CFRE, LLC v. Greenville County AssessorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- State v. DuncanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Smith v. TiffanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
- State v. WhitnerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
- Centex International, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.