Livingston v. Essex Investment Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClabicsoN, J.
At the close of plaintiff’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence, the defendant in the court below made motions for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. The court below overruled these motions and in this we can see no error.
This action is brought by plaintiff, a tenant, against the defendant, the landlord, for actionable negligence.
It is well settled in this jurisdiction, as was said in Salter v. Gordon, 200 N. C., 381 (382) : “In the absence of an agreement as to repairs the landlord is not obligated to keep the building in repair for the benefit of his tenant. Improvement…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Blackmore v. . WindersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Miles v. JanvrinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Galvin v. BealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Aderholt v. . CondonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Conley v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Duke Power Company v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Rietze v. Williams Ex Rel. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
- Holcomb v. Colonial Associates, L.L.C.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- Crouse v. VernonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Durkin v. HansenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.