Crouse v. Vernon
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
It is often not advisable, and sometimes impossible to set out in detail all the challenges made to the validity of a trial, with accompanying explanatory matter, in the space allotted for statement of the case and the opinion. All these objections have, of course, received due consideration; but we are compelled to confine discussion to those which have been advanced as disclosing more outstanding prejudicial error. Those to which more importance seems to have been given are discussed.
1. Objection to the admission and exclusion of evidence.
An exception is directed to the admission of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Speas v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Penn v. Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Grubbs v. North Carolina Home InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Wyatt v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- State v. . PageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sprouse v. North River InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Arnold v. Ray Charles Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Blount-Midyette & Co. v. Aeroglide CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- In Re GibbonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- State Highway Commission v. MatthisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.