Legal Opinion
United States v. Bdo Seidman
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 26, 2003No. 02-3914PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
337 F.3d 802
UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
BDO SEIDMAN, regarding promoter examination of BDO Seidman, Respondent-Appellee.
Appeals of: John Doe and Jane Doe and Richard Roe and Mary Roe, Proposed Intervenors.
No. 02-3914.
No. 02-3915.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Argued May 30, 2003.
Decided July 23, 2003.
Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc Denied August 26, 2003*.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Kenneth W. Rosenberg, Frank P. Cihlar (argued), Dept. of Justice, Tax Div., Appellate Section, Washington, DC, for Petitioner-Appellee.
Donald R. Cassling, Jenner…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Arthur Young & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Swidler & Berlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. BiscegliaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Schaeffler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- Diversified Group, Inc. v. DaugerdasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- United States v. Deborah Ahmad BeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Kpmg LLPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.