Hughes Transportation, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtDurfee, Judge
This claim for refund by plaintiff concerns the applicable charges for shipments of ammunition by plaintiff for defendant. During the month of June 1951, plaintiff motor carrier transported 15 shipments of ammunition on 15 Government bills of lading from Fort Estill, Kentucky to Milan, Tennessee. The initial billing by plaintiff and payment by defendant for these shipments was pursuant to a special rate specified for the Government by plaintiff under a Section 22 Quotation No. 34, effective June 22, 1951, the day before the first transportation of these 15 shipments. A Section 22 Quotation is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Baggett Transportation Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Aero Mayflower Transit Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Union Pacific Railroad Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
- Hayes Freight Lines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
3Cited by8 opinions
- C & H Transportation Co., Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
- Container Transport International, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
- Jet Forwarding, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- C & H Transportation Co., Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.