Legal Opinion

Container Transport International, Inc. v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 19, 1971No. 195-67PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This case was referred to Trial Commissioner Roald A. Hogenson with directions to make findings of fact and recommendation for conclusions of law under the order of reference and Rule 134(h). The commissioner has done so in an opinion and report filed on February 12, 1970. Exceptions to the commissioner’s opinion, findings and recommended conclusion of law were filed by plaintiff. Defendant urged that the court adopt the said report as its basis for decision in the case, although the report recommended dismissal of defendant’s counterclaims, as well as plaintiff’s petition, to which…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. J. A. Jones Construction Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  2. Baggett Transportation Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  3. Baggett Transportation Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  4. Hughes Transportation, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  5. Great Northern Railway Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Container Transport International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  2. Jet Forwarding, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
  3. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  4. Tri-State Motor Transit Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  5. Dean Van Lines, Inc.United States Court of Claims · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API