Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. County of Placer
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 3, 2021No. 2:21-cv-00779Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | Tylor Armstrong, et al., No. 2:21-cv-00779-KJM-KJIN 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER 13 v. 14 County of Placer, et al., 1 > Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiffs Tylor Armstrong and Kimberly Armstrong move for a temporary restraining 18 | order barring defendants AT&T Mobility (AT&T) and any persons acting in concert with it from 19 | beginning construction of a cellphone tower close to their second home in Lake Tahoe. See 20 | generally Mot. TRO, ECF No. 4; Mem. P&A (Mem.), ECF No. 4-1; Compl., ECF No. 1. 21 |…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.