Legal Opinion

Hale v. Hale

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 19, 1985No. 8418DC599PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

In his only assignment of error defendant asserts that the court erred as a matter of law in denying his motion to dismiss a portion of plaintiffs claim for lack of jurisdiction. G.S. l-277(b) provides that “[a]ny interested party shall have the right of immediate appeal from an adverse ruling as to the jurisdiction of the court over the person or property of the defendant. . . .” This section does not apply to orders denying motions made pursuant to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 12(b)(1) seeking dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Teachy v. Coble Dairies, Inc., 306 N.C.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 53 PeoplesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Teachy v. Coble Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Kinross-Wright v. Kinross-WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. Barber v. . BarberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Neal v. NealCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grimsley v. NelsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  2. Van Engen v. Que Scientific, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Macher v. MacherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. Dean v. BrunoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. Grimsley v. NelsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API