Hale v. Hale
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Chief Judge.
In his only assignment of error defendant asserts that the court erred as a matter of law in denying his motion to dismiss a portion of plaintiffs claim for lack of jurisdiction. G.S. l-277(b) provides that “[a]ny interested party shall have the right of immediate appeal from an adverse ruling as to the jurisdiction of the court over the person or property of the defendant. . . .” This section does not apply to orders denying motions made pursuant to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 12(b)(1) seeking dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Teachy v. Coble Dairies, Inc., 306 N.C.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 53 PeoplesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Teachy v. Coble Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Kinross-Wright v. Kinross-WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Barber v. . BarberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Neal v. NealCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
3Cited by5 opinions
- Grimsley v. NelsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- Van Engen v. Que Scientific, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Macher v. MacherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Dean v. BrunoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Grimsley v. NelsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996