Legal Opinion
Van Engen v. Que Scientific, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided August 6, 2002No. COA01-578PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McGEE, Judge.
Randall Van Engen (plaintiff) filed a complaint dated 17 August 1998 against Que Scientific Inc. d/b/a PC Superstore (Que Scientific) seeking damages for alleged unpaid overtime wages and discriminatory employment practices. The complaint and summons were served on Que Scientific by registered mail through its registered agent, Regina Dean, on 19 August 1998. Que Scientific filed an answer dated 13 October 1998. John Dean, as president of Que Scientific, filed an affidavit dated 30 September 1998 (R18) stating that Que Scientific was a North Carolina corporation with assets in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Sharpe v. WorlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- Grimsley v. NelsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- Guthrie v. RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- County of Wayne Ex Rel. Williams v. WhitleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re A.B.D.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Cohen v. McLawhornCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Sea Ranch II Owners Association, Inc. v. Sea Ranch II, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Dewey Wright Well & Pump Co. v. WorlockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- Pope v. PopeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.