Legal Opinion

Blair v. State

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided February 2, 1993No. 91-1884PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYDEN, Judge.

On appeal James Blair, an inmate at the Anamosa reformatory, asserts the district court wrongfully denied him postconviction relief from a prison disciplinary determination he violated a prison rule. The discipline resulted from Blair’s refusal to obey three direct orders to work a second shift of overtime. The orders were made by a correctional officer. The applicant claims he had earlier agreed with another correctional officer to work one overtime shift which would terminate just prior to the Super Bowl game. Apparently, there was not clear cut policy regarding an inmate…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hinkle v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  2. Rushing v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  3. Harper v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  2. Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API