Reed v. Melnick
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SPIESS, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff (Reed) sued defendant (Mel-nick) for damages based upon an alleged libelous publication. The complaint was dismissed by the trial court for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Appeal is from this order. The basis of the order of dismissal is “that the matter complained of does not constitute libel per se” and “that plaintiff failed to plead special damages.”
The sole question presented here is whether the language of the alleged publication is libelous per se. It is alleged that defendant published a false and defamatory statement…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- November v. Time Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Whitby v. Associates Discount Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- Cinquanta v. BurdettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
- Tucker v. KilgoreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Reed v. MelnickNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
- Reed v. MelnickNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969