Legal Opinion
Reed v. Melnick
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided December 3, 1969No. 327Published
1Opinion of the Court
462 P.2d 148 (1969)
81 N.M. 14
F.L.W. REED, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Mitchell MELNICK, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 327.
Court of Appeals of New Mexico.
October 31, 1969.
Writ of Certiorari Issued December 3, 1969.
Sterling F. Black, Los Alamos, for plaintiff-appellant.
Joseph G. Lawler, Sommer & Lawler, Santa Fe, for defendant-appellee.
OPINION
SPIESS, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff (Reed) sued defendant (Melnick) for damages based upon an alleged libelous publication. The complaint was dismissed by the trial court for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Appeal is from this order. The basis of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- November v. Time Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Whitby v. Associates Discount Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- Cinquanta v. BurdettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
- Tucker v. KilgoreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.