Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Arthur Japan

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 6, 1896No. 1488PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the County of Bell. Original application for habeas corpus to be relieved from custody under a judgment of the City Court of Temple, imposing a fine of $25 for selling beer in a theater.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is an original application to this court for a writ of habeas corpus. We have heretofore held that, “While the Constitution and statutes on this subject give this court jurisdiction to issue writs of habeas corpus, yet we do not believe it was the intention of the lawmakers to constitute this tribunal a nisi prius court for the purpose of issuing and trying, indiscriminately, all cases of habeas corpus. The Constitution and laws of this State authorize us to review such cases on appeal.” See, Ex parte Lambert (Tex. Crim. App.), 36 S. W. Rep., 81. The application could…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte EzellTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Ex Parte LambertCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RodriguezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
  2. Ex Parte McKayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Ex Parte BockhornCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Ex Parte JarvisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Ex parte ValdezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API