Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Lambert

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 27, 1896No. 1050PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Prom Palo Pinto County. Original application to the Court of Criminal Appeals for a writ of habeas corpus in a matter growing out of local option. No statement necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Judge.

The applicant is charged by information with a violation of the local option law in Palo Pinto County., and has applied to this court for a writ of habeas corpus. As a part of his application, he has a statement from the County Judge suggesting that he believes that he is recused to try said case on habeas corpus, because a mandamus suit is pending against him and others, involving the validity ■of the local option election in Palo Pinto County. Prom the statement made, we do not understand the County Judge to be disqualified to entertain said writ. We are also of the opinion…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Carey v. SaffoldSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Ex Parte McKayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Ex Parte JarvisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Ex parte ValdezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
  5. Ex Parte Arthur JapanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API