Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Bockhorn

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 21, 1911No. 131PublishedCited by 19 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Relator was tried and convicted in the Justice Court under a complaint charging him with following the occupation and pursuing the business of selling sewing machines without first having paid an occupation tax. He resorted to a writ of habeas corpus before the county judge to test the constitutionality of the Act of the Legislature levying the tax. Upon a hearing the county judge remanded relator to custody. From that judgment this appeal is prosecuted.

The provision of the Act of the Legislature levying this tax is in the following language: “From every person,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Seneca Mining Co. v. OsmunMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Boales v. FergusonNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Rainey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  5. Finders v. BodleNebraska Supreme Court · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Reyes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Hurt v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Alexander v. JohnsonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2001
  4. Ringling v. City of HempsteadCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1911
  5. Grossman v. Hudspeth County Conservation & Reclamation Dist. No. 1Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API