Legal Opinion

City of Princeton v. Woodruff

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1952No. 28,873PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilkison, C. J.

This is an action by the City of Princeton, Indiana against M. Vernor Woodruff, its Mayor and twenty-five others, his appointees, praying that the mayor and such appointees be enjoined and restrained from retaining possession of any and all property, real and personal, belonging to the city; from interfering with, molesting or hampering appointees, of the common council of the city, in the performance of their respective duties; that the defendants, Woodruff and Garrett, be restrained from pretending to act as a board of public works and safety for the city; that upon a hearing each of the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Crawfordsville v. BradenIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Scott v. City of LaporteIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Champer v. City of GreencastleIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. State Ex Rel. Cline v. SchrickerIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Board of Public Safety v. WallingIndiana Supreme Court · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1978
  2. City of Princeton v. WoodruffIndiana Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API