Legal Opinion

Champer v. City of Greencastle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1893No. 16,977PublishedCited by 34 opinions

From the Putnam Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, C. J.

This was a suit by the appellee against the appellant, begun in the mayor’s court of said city, to recover the penalty provided for the violation of an ordinance of said city. Appellee recovered judgment, from which appéllant appealed to the circuit court, where appellant’s demurrer to the complaint, for want of sufficient facts, and his motion to dismiss the cause, were both overruled, after which appellee again recovered judgment. Appellant assigns for error these rulings of the trial court, and that the complaint does not state facts sufficient.

The whole question, thus raised, turns upon-…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mayor of Baltimore v. RadeckeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
  2. First National Bank v. SarllsIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Columbus & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. HarringtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Ex Parte FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  5. City of Crawfordsville v. BradenIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Blue v. BeachIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  2. State v. Mountain Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. City of Logansport v. Public Service CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Shea v. City of MuncieIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. City of Baxter Springs v. BryantSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API