Legal Opinion
Berger v. Fitzgerald
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 5, 1999No. AC 18045PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*140 Opinion
LAVERY, J.
The plaintiffs1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court quieting title2 to certain real property in favor of the defendant Arthur L. Fitzgerald III (Fitzgerald III). The land was sold pursuant to a tax sale. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim (1) that General Statutes (Rev. to 1991) § 12-159 validates and cures any defects in the tax sale and (2) that the trial court improperly (a) concluded that the description of the land in the tax sale notice was insufficient and (b) determined the ownership of the land. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- West Hartford Interfaith Coalition, Inc. v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- SAC Downtown Ltd. Partnership v. KahnWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Straus v. FoxworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Linn County v. RozelleOregon Supreme Court · 1945
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- TOWN OF TRUMBULL v. PalmerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Lux v. Environmental Warranty, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Johnson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Taylor v. BARBERINOConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Berger v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999