Legal Opinion
Gates Iron Works v. Overland Gold Min. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided September 3, 1906No. 2,017PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District, of Utah.
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DEVANTER, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a, decree of dismissal of a bill for the infringement of claims 1, 2, 3r and 4 of letters patent No. 525,419, issued September 4, 1894, to the-appellant, upon the application of Avery Eugene Hoyt, and of claim. 1 of letters patent No. 616,659, issued December 27, 1898, to the-appellant upon the application of Philetus Warren Gates and Thomas W. Capen. Both patents were for improvements in gyratorystone crushers, the art in relation to which is shown to have been. *701well advanced. The construction and operation oí such a crusher are sufficiently…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Hendy v. Golden State & Miners' Iron WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Gates Iron Works v. FraserSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Birmingham Cement Manufacturing Co. v. Gates Iron WorksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1896
3Cited by4 opinions
- Linville v. MilbergerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
- Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Pittsburgh Transformer Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1926
- Hughes Tool Co. v. International Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- Hughes Tool Co. v. International Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931