Legal Opinion

Bourk v. ISEMAN MOBILE HOMES, ETC.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1982No. 13350PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSHEIM, Justice.'

Harriet Bourk and Neil Huckfeldt (appellants) purchased a Windsor mobile home from Iseman Mobile Homes (Iseman) of Pierre, South Dakota. Appellants subsequently sued Iseman and the manufacturer of the mobile home, Windsor Mobile Homes, Inc. (Windsor), alleging in Count I breach of warranty and in Count II fraud through misrepresentation. Appellants sought actual and exemplary damages. The trial court granted the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on Count II. Appellants appeal the summary judgment and the trial court’s denial of their motion to amend their complaint to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hughes-Johnson Co. v. Dakota Midland HospitalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. DelzerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Farmers and Merchants State Bank v. MannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Burke v. Thomas ChevroletSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Garrett v. BankWest, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Staab v. CameronSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Caneva v. Miners and Merchants BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. GridleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Peterson v. RogersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API