Legal Opinion

Theiler v. Ventura County Community College District

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 25, 2011No. B222321PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILBERT, P. J.

A community college district summarily terminated the employment of a basketball coach. The district claimed the coach was not entitled to due process because he was a temporary employee. During the coach’s employment, Education Code section 87482.5, former subdivision (a) defined a temporary employee as one who is employed to teach classes “for not more than 60 percent of the hours per week considered a full-time assignment for regular employees having comparable duties.”1 The coach claimed he was employed to teach more than 60 percent of a full-time assignment. Thus he…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Szadolci v. Hollywood Park Operating Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Balasubramanian v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Stryker v. Antelope Valley Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. McGuire v. Governing BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Santa Monica College Faculty Ass'n v. Santa Monica Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Wendee Long v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2015
  3. Long, WendeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API