City of Fort Smith v. Brewer
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John A. Fogleman, Justice.
This appeal involves questions about the amount of holiday pay to which firemen in the City of Fort Smith are entitled, and the terms on which it is to be paid. It requires a construction of Act 132 of 1955, as amended by Act 264 of 1957, now appearing as Ark. Stat. Ann. §§ 19-2108 and 19-2109 (Repl. 1968). The action was instituted by appellees Brewer, Browder and Corbin, as a class action on behalf of all firemen of the city. They sought to recover pay for the holidays specified by the statute in lieu of additional days of vacation theretofore granted. They based…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ark. State Highway Comm. v. MabrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
- Cook v. BevillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
- Lafargue v. WaggonerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- Smith v. PageSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
- Indian Bayou Drainage District v. DickieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Pullano v. City of BluefieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
- Cousins v. DennisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- McGee v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Pyles v. Triple F. Feeds of Texas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
- Donaldson v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.