Legal Opinion

Smith v. Page

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 2, 1936No. 4-4126PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Henry Armistead, Special C. J.

The action from which this appeal arises was filed in Pulaski Chancery Court, June 17, 1935, by appellant, as a taxpayer, and State Comptroller, against the Auditor and Treasurer of State, alleging that the Legislature of 1933 failed to appropriate funds for the payment of salaries of prosecuting attorneys for the period from July 1, 1933, to June 30,1935; that the prosecuting attorneys hold salary vouchers or warrants for part of this period, issued under the provisions of act 227 of 1935; that unless restrained the Treasurer will pay these warrants from current…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Thomas v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
  2. Glavey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Griffin v. RhotonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  4. Holder v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
  5. Abramson v. HardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Martindale v. HoneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  2. City of Fort Smith v. BrewerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  3. Weems v. AndersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  4. County Commissioners v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  5. State v. WinneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API