Legal Opinion
(PC) Crane v. Rodriguez
District Court, E.D. California
Decided June 17, 2020No. 2:15-cv-00208Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD JOSEPH CRANE, No. 2:15-cv-00208-TLN-KJN 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 RODRIGUEZ, et al., 15 Defendant. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Richard Joseph Crane’s (“Plaintiff”) Request 18 for Reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s order filed April 22, 2020 (ECF No. 209), partially- 19 denying Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel. (ECF No. 213.) For the reasons set forth below, 20 Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. 21 / / / 22 / / / 23 / / / 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / 1 I. FACTUAL…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kern-Tulare Water District v. City of BakersfieldDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1986
- Kern-Tulare Water District v. City of BakersfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Craig John Maisonville, and James M. Dombroski v. F2 America, Inc. F2 International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Thomas Burdick, Estate of Perrin v. Burdick v. Commissioner Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.