Legal Opinion

Harty v. Hoerner

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 29, 1969No. 22475PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Hodges.

As the plaintiff in the trial court, Lloyd J. Harty, Jr., sought to recover on a promissory note in the amount of $5,000 payable to him and signed by Fred Hoerner, the defendant in error. Hoerner’s answer admitted execution and delivery of the promissory note to Harty and nonpayment of the note. As a defense, Hoerner alleged he intended to and did execute the note in his capacity as president of Nemrava & Company and that the note in question was, in fact, the corporate obligation of Nemrava & Company and not his personal obligation. There was no wording under the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McCaffrey v. MitchellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
  2. Munro v. KingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1877
  3. Weston v. EsteySupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  4. Gibbs v. WallaceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
  5. Abercrombie v. Bear Canon Coal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bledsoe v. HillColorado Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. St. Jude's Co. v. Roaring Fork Club, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2015
  3. O'Reilly v. Physicians Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. St. Jude's Co. v. Roaring Fork Club, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API