Legal Opinion

McCaffrey v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 6, 1936No. 13,536PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE plaintiff in error will herein be referred to as plaintiff, and the defendant in error as defendant.

In May, 1929, plaintiff sold to the defendant certain real property, and as a part of the transaction, defendant gave plaintiff his promissory note for $200 due in two years, secured by a second deed of trust on the premises conveyed, which note is the subject matter of this litigation. Prior to maturity of the note, plaintiff placed it with Feigel, a practicing attorney of Boulder, Colorado, for collection. Defendant sold the property to one Shinkle who on the trial testified that he…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burke v. DulaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Ware v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Julius Kessler & Co. v. PareliusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  4. Richardson Drug Co. v. DunaganColorado Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Yentzer v. ThayerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Burenheide v. WallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  2. Clough v. Williams Production RMT Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Stevens v. Vail Associates, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. McGuire v. LuckenbachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  5. Simpson v. MilneColorado Court of Appeals · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API