Legal Opinion

Aultman & Co. v. Richardson

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 30, 1894No. 1,260PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Madison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtLotz, C. J.

This action was brought by the appellees against the appellant and Amos G. Allen and Mary Chapman, to recover the possession of a traction engine, a separator and straw stacker, of which the appellees claimed to be the owners. Allen and Chapman disclaimed any interest in the property. The appellant filed an answer in denial. Appellees had a verdict in which all the property in controversy was found to be of the value of $500. The only questions presented for our consideration arise on'the motion for a new trial. It appears from the evidence that the appellant sold to appellees a traction…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brower v. NellisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Springfield Engine & Thresher Co. v. KennedyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Aultman & Co. v. ForgeyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Hutt v. BruckmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reichert v. KrassIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Kern v. SaulIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Aultman & Co. v. RichardsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Young v. VailNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API