Legal Opinion

Holmquist v. Spinelli

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 27, 1953PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtInglis, J.

This is an action to recover for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff as a result of the claimed negligence of the defendant. The complaint alleged that the injuries were of a serious, painful and permanent character and consisted of a severe contusion of the right knee, a fracture of the patella, injury to the semilunar cartilage and a severe shock to the plaintiff’s nervous system. It was further alleged that the plaintiff had incurred expense for medical care and was for a long time incapacitated from pursuing her occupation, with resultant loss of earnings. She claimed $7500…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Atlantic Refining Co. v. SchoenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  2. Inhabitants of Newtown v. Inhabitants of DanburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1821
  3. Prince v. TakashSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
  4. Main v. First School District in the Second School Society in PrestonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1846
  5. Sullivan v. VailSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1875

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Carten v. CartenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  2. Hodge v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Southington '84 Associates v. Silver Dollar Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. Davis v. Borough of NaugatuckConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  5. Grodis v. BurnsConnecticut Superior Court · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API