Legal Opinion
Davis v. Borough of Naugatuck
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 12, 1988No. 5903PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStoughton, J.
The defendant has appealed from the judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiffs after a trial to the court. We find error in part.
The plaintiff Ardis Davis alleged that she suffered injuries on May 19, 1979, when she struck a pothole in an intersection in the borough of Naugatuck while operating a vehicle owned by her husband, the plaintiff Denman Davis, and while in the exercise of due care. In a second count, the plaintiff Denman Davis alleged that his automobile was substantially damaged by the occurrence. Each plaintiff alleged a breach of statutory duty by the defendant in that there…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Lukas v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Kiniry v. Danbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Wolk v. WolkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Thomas v. KatzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Southington '84 Associates v. Silver Dollar Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Town of Killingly v. WellsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Yarbrough v. DemirjianConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- In re Shonna K.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Corosa Realty v. Covenant InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.