Legal Opinion

Vanoss v. BHP Copper Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 8, 2018No. 2 CA-CV 2017-0033Published

1Opinion of the Court

ECKERSTROM, Chief Judge:

¶ 1 Pierre and Lynn Vanoss, parents of the decedent, Jon Pierre Vanoss, and guardians of two of his minor children, along with Erin Healey, parent and guardian of a third child (collectively, "the Family"), appeal from the trial court's judgment following a jury trial and verdict in favor of BHP Copper Inc., alleging numerous claims of error. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Factual and Procedural History

¶ 2 The following facts are not in dispute. In 2012, BHP began rebuilding and refurbishing certain facilities at the Pinto Valley…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. United States v. Monroe Adlman, as Officer and Representative of Sequa CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  3. Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Welker v. Kennecott Copper CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  5. Ft. Lowell-NSS Ltd. Partnership v. KellyArizona Supreme Court · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API