Legal Opinion

State v. Wright

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 5, 1986No. 8626SC55PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Judge.

Defendant was convicted of four counts of armed robbery in violation of G.S. 14-87. His request for a new trial is based upon a solitary assignment of error which contends that the presumption of innocence that is the right of each person tried for crime in this country was undermined “in the eyes of the jurors” by the court erroneously trying him in leg shackles and in failing to take adequate “remedial measures” to prevent the prejudice. The following legal principles, basic to restraining defendants in court and recognized by both parties in their briefs, are pertinent:…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. TolleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. United States v. Robert L. SamuelCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
  3. State v. MilbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. United States v. Robert L. SamuelCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
  5. State v. ScottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. State v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. State v. PoseyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API