Legal Opinion

Tate v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 26, 1988No. 53404PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

Movant was convicted by a jury of forcible rape, forcible sodomy, burglary in the first degree, and two counts of robbery in the first degree. He was sentenced as a prior and dangerous offender to terms of imprisonment totaling ninety-five years. That judgment was reversed and remanded with directions. State v. Tate, 657 S.W.2d 727 (Mo.App.1983). Movant was charged by information as a prior and dangerous offender and the judge assessed punishment. However, the only evidence in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  2. State v. WynnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. State v. LeeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. State v. StreetMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. State v. TateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. CullenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. State v. McGowanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Nash v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Donald Lee Tate v. William M. Armontrout, Warden, Missouri State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  5. State v. SummersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API