Legal Opinion

Nash v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 15, 1989No. 55878PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAROHL, Judge.

Movant, Hiawatha Nash, is serving two concurrent ten year sentences after guilty pleas to two counts of stealing over $150 in violation of § 570.030 RSMo 1986, a class “C” felony. Movant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender. Movant filed a Rule 24.035 motion, seeking to set aside sentencing as a prior and persistent offender. He claims there was no evidence presented at the plea hearing to establish he was a prior and persistent offender. The motion court denied movant’s claim without an evidentiary hearing. We find there was no evidence presented at the plea hearing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. State v. FinchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Eakins v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Tate v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Knight v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dudley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. State v. RussMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Matthews v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Carrothers v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Sayre v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API